One of the stated intentions of this blog was to have light hearted digs at UPA -2. However, it is a bit difficult to see the humorous side when more than 100 innocent people are massacred. Over the past few months, the country has seen numerous daring attacks by Maoists on security forces as well as common civilians. While the clamour for a befitting reply has justifiably grown shriller, the UPA President feels that the solution to this menace is to address the ‘root cause’. But has anyone even bothered to ask her what exactly are these ‘root causes’ of which she seeks redressal? Maybe a look at the history of Naxalism will help us understand what their core issues are.
The Maoist movement kicked off as an armed revolt by landless tribals in small time Naxalbari (hence the name Naxals) against the zamindari system. The revolt was crushed within months, but it spawned various forms of armed extremism subscribing to Mao’s philosophy. Charu Mazumdar, the first General Secretary of the CPI (ML) and one of the foremost Maoist ideologues, described the twin aims of the armed struggle as ‘seizure of state power’ and overthrow of the ‘Capitalist’ system. If the Congress President seeks to address these core issues, then UPA-2 is certainly on course. At the start of the rebellion, however, the root cause did not seem so important to the Congress. Rebellions in various parts of the country were swiftly crushed. Then, as now, Maoists were the biggest threat to the State as they are today. But then, they were also the biggest threat to the Grand Old Party of Indian Politics. That does not seem to be the case today as Maoists have emerged as useful allies to the Trinamool in its fight against the Left Front in the vulnerable state of West Bengal and hence, the change in the Govt.’s attitude and policy towards Naxals.
If there is something that Mrs. Gandhi needs to address, it is this policy of appeasement that has been the ‘root cause’ behind the growth of not just Naxalism but also other forms of terrorism and regional warlords who have converted parts of the country into their own personal fiefdoms. The Maoists firmly believe that ‘Power flows from the barrel of a gun’. Anybody who believes that there is scope for dialogue with such a clan is either unbelievably naïve or perpetually blinded by the electoral benefits of inaction.
One heartening facet of the tragedy has been the maturity displayed by the opposition in dealing with a potentially crucial poll plank. There is a consensus among the national parties that P. Chidambaram is the right person to clean up the mess. However, he is the right man in the wrong party. He is a lucky man to enjoy the backing of the opposition on a sensitive issue. Unfortunately, his luck runs out when it comes to his own party and allies. He has often hinted at his mandate being limited by petty politics within his own party while Mamata refuses to accept the existence of Maoists entirely. PC’s condition is strikingly similar to that of a Guard Dog which has the canines to bite and the heart for a fight but also a leash around his neck which prevents him from doing either. He can only watch the house getting robbed as his Master refuses to wake from his slumber. The visual of well intentioned individuals and policies being restricted by political compulsions has become an all too familiar feature of UPA-2.
The situation has obvious parallels with the Indian Cricket Team that failed to perform during the WC. On paper, the trio of PC, MMS and Pranab form a perfect team just like the combination of Dhoni, Yuvraj and Co. But their performance has been miserable on all fronts, most notably inflation, security and corruption. While the Men in Blue were exposed by their inability to stand up to the short ball, UPA-2 is inhibited by its inability to stand up to its own allies. AB Vajpayee was often, unfairly, called the secular mask of a communal NDA. MMS is the efficient and honest (yet powerless) mask of a malfunctioning, corrupt UPA -2. Despite all these failures, recent surveys by leading national news channels claim that the country finds no fault with the PM or the HM. Though I am not entirely convinced about the statistical correctness of such surveys, let us, for the sake of argument, accept that they do reflect the mood of the nation. Vir Sanghvi, in a recent article, suggested that the personality of PC and MMS forces people to gloss over the evident failures of the government. If that is indeed the case, then the nation seems to forget that by voting for individuals like MMS and PC they are also voting for the coterie of Yes-men that surround Mrs. Gandhi. By doing so, we stand to make the same mistake that our selectors made by picking people on reputation rather than on performance and should not expect different results. As Einstein would say, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”
The Maoist movement kicked off as an armed revolt by landless tribals in small time Naxalbari (hence the name Naxals) against the zamindari system. The revolt was crushed within months, but it spawned various forms of armed extremism subscribing to Mao’s philosophy. Charu Mazumdar, the first General Secretary of the CPI (ML) and one of the foremost Maoist ideologues, described the twin aims of the armed struggle as ‘seizure of state power’ and overthrow of the ‘Capitalist’ system. If the Congress President seeks to address these core issues, then UPA-2 is certainly on course. At the start of the rebellion, however, the root cause did not seem so important to the Congress. Rebellions in various parts of the country were swiftly crushed. Then, as now, Maoists were the biggest threat to the State as they are today. But then, they were also the biggest threat to the Grand Old Party of Indian Politics. That does not seem to be the case today as Maoists have emerged as useful allies to the Trinamool in its fight against the Left Front in the vulnerable state of West Bengal and hence, the change in the Govt.’s attitude and policy towards Naxals.
If there is something that Mrs. Gandhi needs to address, it is this policy of appeasement that has been the ‘root cause’ behind the growth of not just Naxalism but also other forms of terrorism and regional warlords who have converted parts of the country into their own personal fiefdoms. The Maoists firmly believe that ‘Power flows from the barrel of a gun’. Anybody who believes that there is scope for dialogue with such a clan is either unbelievably naïve or perpetually blinded by the electoral benefits of inaction.
One heartening facet of the tragedy has been the maturity displayed by the opposition in dealing with a potentially crucial poll plank. There is a consensus among the national parties that P. Chidambaram is the right person to clean up the mess. However, he is the right man in the wrong party. He is a lucky man to enjoy the backing of the opposition on a sensitive issue. Unfortunately, his luck runs out when it comes to his own party and allies. He has often hinted at his mandate being limited by petty politics within his own party while Mamata refuses to accept the existence of Maoists entirely. PC’s condition is strikingly similar to that of a Guard Dog which has the canines to bite and the heart for a fight but also a leash around his neck which prevents him from doing either. He can only watch the house getting robbed as his Master refuses to wake from his slumber. The visual of well intentioned individuals and policies being restricted by political compulsions has become an all too familiar feature of UPA-2.
The situation has obvious parallels with the Indian Cricket Team that failed to perform during the WC. On paper, the trio of PC, MMS and Pranab form a perfect team just like the combination of Dhoni, Yuvraj and Co. But their performance has been miserable on all fronts, most notably inflation, security and corruption. While the Men in Blue were exposed by their inability to stand up to the short ball, UPA-2 is inhibited by its inability to stand up to its own allies. AB Vajpayee was often, unfairly, called the secular mask of a communal NDA. MMS is the efficient and honest (yet powerless) mask of a malfunctioning, corrupt UPA -2. Despite all these failures, recent surveys by leading national news channels claim that the country finds no fault with the PM or the HM. Though I am not entirely convinced about the statistical correctness of such surveys, let us, for the sake of argument, accept that they do reflect the mood of the nation. Vir Sanghvi, in a recent article, suggested that the personality of PC and MMS forces people to gloss over the evident failures of the government. If that is indeed the case, then the nation seems to forget that by voting for individuals like MMS and PC they are also voting for the coterie of Yes-men that surround Mrs. Gandhi. By doing so, we stand to make the same mistake that our selectors made by picking people on reputation rather than on performance and should not expect different results. As Einstein would say, “Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.”